Resources

Contraceptive Pearls: Miudella: A New Lower-Dose Copper IUD Option

Sign up to Receive Contraceptive Pearls Monthly!If you enjoyed this Contraceptive Pearl, sign up to have them delivered to your inbox! Contraceptive Pearls are released on the third Tuesday of every month!


Written by Arielle Schecter, MD

Miudella is now the second nonhormonal intrauterine device (IUD) available in the United States, following ParaGard, which was approved in 1984.1,2 With its nitinol (nickel-titanium) frame, Miudella is smaller and more flexible than the rigid polyethylene frame of ParaGard. Miudella has a lower dose of copper (175mm2 vs. 380mm2) and a thinner, tapered insertion tube. Miudella comes pre-loaded in a sterile inserter, has pre-cut removal strings, and is FDA-approved for prevention of pregnancy for up to three years. 

Risks of the Miudella are similar to the other IUDs, including perforation, expulsion, infection, and altered uterine bleeding patterns.1,3,4 Contraindications to Miudella are the same as other IUDs, with the additional contraindication for Wilson’s disease and hypersensitivity to any component. Miudella’s use as post-coital/emergency contraception is specifically contraindicated by the FDA.

No trial directly compares Miudella and ParaGard. Their respective trials included different study designs, participant compositions (e.g., parity, age, body mass index, and race/ethnicity) and monitoring parameters. As such, definitive comparative claims on effectiveness, insertion pain, bleeding, expulsion, side effect profile, discontinuation, and patient satisfaction cannot be made.

FDA labeling data1,2 Miudella ParaGard
Copper dose 175mm2 380mm2
FDA-approved duration of use 3 years 10 years
Cumulative pregnancy rate Pearl Index 1.05

(95% CI 0.66–1.60)

over 3 years

<1 per 100 patients each year over 10 years
Expulsion rate 3.6% over 3 years 2.3% over 10 years
Discontinuation for bleeding/pain after 1 year 8.5% 12%

The FDA-approved duration of Miudella use is currently three years, although follow-up data provide evidence for maintained effectiveness to five years.5 Of note, ParaGard is FDA-approved for up to ten years, with evidence supporting effectiveness for at least 12 years.2,6,7

A secondary analysis of a randomized copper IUD trial – which did not specifically study Miudella – found an association between menstrual cup use and accidental IUD self-removal.8 The Miudella prescribing information notes that menstrual cups and discs are not recommended due to risk of IUD displacement or expulsion.

Unlike other currently available IUDs, Miudella is subject to a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS). Clinicians must enroll in the Miudella REMS and complete required online training before they are able to provide the device.

Key Takeaways:

  • Miudella is FDA-approved for three years of contraception.1
  • Miudella is smaller, more flexible, and has a lower dose of copper than ParaGard. Its inserter is also tapered and smaller in diameter than ParaGard’s.1,2
  • Miudella comes pre-loaded in its inserter and has pre-cut strings.1
  • Miudella seems to have similar effectiveness rates to ParaGard at five years, based on separate studies.5,9,10
  • Miudella’s smaller size, smaller and tapered inserter, lower copper dose, flexible frame, and copper placement may confer benefit with regard to insertion pain and patient satisfaction (ex: bleeding, discontinuation rates)  when compared to ParaGard; however, direct head-to-head trials have not yet been conducted.10,11,12,13,14,15
  • Menstrual cups and discs are not recommended with Miudella.1,8
  • Miudella is contraindicated as an emergency contraceptive.1
  • REMS enrollment and online training are required for Miudella prescribers.1

RHAP Resources:

Your Birth Control Choices Fact Sheet

IUD Fact Sheet

Download and print our resources for free from our website or visit our store to buy physical copies!


Partner Resources:

Reproductive Health Hotline (ReproHH): A free, confidential phone service (1-844-737-7644) offering evidence-based clinical information for healthcare providers across the US who have questions related to sexual and reproductive health.


Sources:

1. Miudella (copper intrauterine system) [prescribing information]. Roswell, GA: Sebela Women’s Health Inc; 2026. Accessed August 18, 2026. [https://sebelapharma.com/assets/media/miudella-PI.pdf]

2. Paragard (intrauterine copper contraceptive) [prescribing information]. Trumbull, CT: CooperSurgical Inc; 2019. Accessed August 18, 2026. [https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/fda/fdaDrugXsl.cfm?setid=3c420b53-c95e-46af-aebd-73741be58391&type=display]

3. Gatz JL, Armstrong MA, Postlethwaite D, et al. Association between intrauterine device type and risk of perforation and device expulsion: results from the Association of Perforation and Expulsion of Intrauterine Device study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(1):57.e1-57.e13. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.062

4. Reed SD, Zhou X, Ichikawa L, et al. Intrauterine device-related uterine perforation incidence and risk (APEX-IUD): a large multisite cohort study. Lancet. 2022;399(10341):2103-2112. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00015-0

5. Gawron LM, Roe AH, Nelson AL, et al. Five-Year Phase 3 Efficacy and Safety Outcomes With a Low-Dose Copper Intrauterine Device. Obstet Gynecol. 2026;147(5):699-707. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000006227

6. Ti AJ, Roe AH, Whitehouse KC, Smith RA, Gaffield ME, Curtis KM. Effectiveness and safety of extending intrauterine device duration: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(1):24-35.e3. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.014

7. Paradise SL, Landis CA, Klein DA. Evidence-Based Contraception: Common Questions and Answers. Am Fam Physician. 2022;106(3):251-259.

8. Brown JE, Creinin MD, Wu H, et al. Menstrual cup use and intrauterine device expulsion in a copper intrauterine device randomized trial. Contraception. 2024;134:110415. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110415

9. Creinin MD, Gawron LM, Roe AH, et al. Three-year efficacy, safety, and tolerability outcomes from a phase 3 study of a low-dose copper intrauterine device. Contraception. 2025;143:110771. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110771

10. Schreiber CA, Nanda K, Hubacher D, et al. Contraceptive Efficacy and Comparative Side Effects of a Mini Copper Intrauterine Device. NEJM Evid. 2025;4(8):EVIDoa2400480. doi:10.1056/EVIDoa2400480

11. Akintomide H, James A, Moffat M, Barnes P, Rankin J. Systematic review of copper intrauterine contraception continuation in young nulliparous women based on intrauterine device type. BMJ Open. 2022;12(10):e060606. Published 2022 Oct 3. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060606

12. Hubacher D, Schreiber CA, Turok DK, et al. Comparing the TCu380A and a small Nova-T copper IUD: secondary analysis of discontinuation probabilities, bleeding outcomes and satisfaction in nulliparous participants from a 3-year randomized trial. Contraception. Published online July 31, 2026. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2026.111571

13. Hubacher D, Schreiber CA, Turok DK, et al. Continuation rates of two different-sized copper intrauterine devices among nulliparous women: Interim 12-month results of a single-blind, randomised, multicentre trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2022;51:101554. Published 2022 Jul 16. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101554

14. Kulier R, O’Brien PA, Helmerhorst FM, Usher-Patel M, D’Arcangues C. Copper containing, framed intra-uterine devices for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2007(4):CD005347. Published 2007 Oct 17. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005347.pub3

15. Reeves MF, Katz BH, Canela JM, Hathaway MJ, Tal MG. A randomized comparison of a novel nitinol-frame low-dose-copper intrauterine contraceptive and a copper T380S intrauterine contraceptive. Contraception. 2017;95(6):544-548. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2017.04.002


Sign up to Receive Contraceptive Pearls Monthly!

If you enjoyed this Contraceptive Pearl, sign up to have them delivered to your inbox! Contraceptive Pearls are released on the third Tuesday of every month!


Sign up to Receive Insights Monthly!

If you enjoyed this Pearl article, then check out Insights! Insights are monthly e-newsletters offering primary care clinicians evidence-based education on abortion and early pregnancy loss care (miscarriage). Read our latest Insights on our website. You can sign upto have Insights delivered to your inbox! Insights are released on the fourth Tuesday of every month!


Pharma-free: The Reproductive Health Access Project does not accept funding from pharmaceutical companies. We do not promote specific brands of medication or products. The information in the Pearls is unbiased, based on science alone.